Silvia Bernardi
Fear of artificial intelligence is spreading and being spread (as a marketing strategy) at an unprecedented speed, almost as fast as the speed at which AI is permeating our daily life. Among other topics, ethicists and AI policymakers talk about universal income, anticipating economic and social disruptions at a global level. In this context, it felt only logical that the topic of this newsletter continues to be the role of AI in our profession as therapists. Data on the use of artificial therapy for humans is slowly trickling in, painting a picture of decent efficacy for the management of clear symptoms of a moderate degree of severity, with manualized interventions (see this excellent Gemini Deep Research review on the current literature below). AI offers a cost-effective, comfortable, and always accessible support, with the additional benefit of avoiding shame and discomfort in the transference (I do not need to highlight how problematic this is, rather than helpful, to this audience).
However, when asked to write this article, the assumption was that I would write about insight-oriented psychotherapy. Given that means expressing opinions, opinions that will inevitably make me look either shortsighted, defensive, or paranoid in 24 months, I did the best I could to avoid writing this piece. I had it written by Claude; the committee told me it felt as if “there was nobody home”. I gave it a comedic turn, which also went nowhere. Encouraged by Michal Novak’s APsA piece, in which he gives voice to the risks associated with anthropomorphism, I decided to attempt to express my preliminary ideas. I want to make clear that my stand is not that of an AI enthusiast. I very much worry about the use of this technology and our own mental health; for one thing, I find it to be inducing manic mood elevations (without entering into well-known cases of horrible outcomes). I worry about the effect it has on our attention. And of course, there are many other worries at a society level that do not escape me. I look at these tools with suspicion, but I do not ignore them because I consider myself a realist. I try to think about life the way I think about my scientific experiments, which means that until something is proven, everything could be.
This article contains exclusive content for ISTFP members.
If you already are a member of the ISTFP, login to read the full text. If you are not a current member of the ISTFP and want to enjoy all of our exclusive content such as blog posts and other resources, please click one of the links below and follow the instructions provided. We look forward to welcoming you to our community.
Renew Now or Join the ISTFP